Last updated Oct. 13, 2026
Ken Paxton FilesTexas’s attorney general, on the record
KPF-003 Retaliation and secrecy Judgment entered

Paxton’s office fired the aides who reported him to the FBI. A court ordered $6.6 million in damages, and taxpayers are paying it.

Four of Paxton’s senior aides reported him to the FBI in 2020 and were then fired. A judge ruled in April 2025 that the firings violated the Texas Whistleblower Act and ordered about $6.6 million in damages. Paxton dropped his appeal, and the money comes from the state, not from him.

StatusJudgment entered
Event period2020–2025
Latest developmentJuly 2, 2025

What happened

In November 2020, four former senior officials of the attorney general’s office sued, saying they were illegally fired after reporting Paxton to the FBI. They were Blake Brickman, David Maxwell, Mark Penley and Ryan Vassar. 01

In February 2023 the two sides reached a tentative $3.3 million settlement that depended on the Legislature paying for it. Lawmakers declined, and the House opened the investigation that led to Paxton’s impeachment. 01

In January 2024 Paxton said he would no longer contest the facts and would accept a judgment. 02 In November 2024 the Texas Supreme Court ruled that Paxton and three deputies did not have to give sworn depositions, because the office no longer disputed liability. 03

On April 4, 2025, a Travis County district judge ruled that the office had violated the Whistleblower Act and awarded the four men about $6.6 million in total. 04 Paxton first said he would appeal, then dropped the appeal in July 2025, leaving the judgment final. 05

Why it matters

Texas taxpayers, not Paxton, owe the $6.6 million, and the Legislature has to set aside public money to pay it. 05

It is the only case arising from the Nate Paul allegations that ended in a court judgment. Paxton stopped contesting the facts, and the Texas Supreme Court then ruled he did not have to testify under oath. 02 03 04

Timeline

  • Nov. 2020
    Aides fired after reporting Paxton to the FBI sue under the Whistleblower Act
  • Jan. 18, 2024
    Paxton stops contesting the facts in the whistleblower case
  • April 4, 2025
    Court orders $6.6 million for the whistleblowers Paxton’s office fired
  • July 2, 2025
    Paxton drops appeal; taxpayers owe the $6.6 million

What the sources show

The firings were never in dispute; the question was whether they were illegal retaliation. After Paxton’s office stopped contesting the facts, a state district court entered judgment that the office violated the Whistleblower Act. That judgment is an official court finding under the civil standard of proof, and it became final when the appeal was dropped. 04 05

The Texas Supreme Court’s November 2024 ruling concerned depositions only and did not decide liability. 03

Relevant response

Paxton’s response

Paxton called the judgment baseless but dropped his appeal. 05 06

Response date — July 3, 2025Last checked — Sept. 24, 2026

Sources

  1. 01Reporting
  2. 02Reporting
  3. 03Reporting
  4. 04Reporting
  5. 05Reporting
  6. 06Reporting

Updates and corrections

  • Sept. 24, 2026
    Case file published. Whether the Legislature has paid the judgment has not yet been confirmed.